Start with Why
If everything you do has an intent or a reason, changing programming just to “mix things up” shouldn’t ever happen. Unfortunately, many strength coaches switch up programming in fear their athletes will get “bored” when in reality, it is usually the coach who gets bored coaching the same movements. Athletes’ programs should only change as their needs change.
Less is More
The body responds and adapts to stress in multiple ways, but it is generally understood that these adaptations are specific to the imposed demands of the stressors. By constantly changing these stressors for the sake of variety, the body is not able to make specific adaptations. Randomized programming can be fun and entertaining for the weekend warrior, but this approach has no place when designing training programs for athletes looking to improve specific movement qualities.
True mastery of movement is much rarer than most might think. We have all seen “elite athletes” struggle with very fundamental tasks or movement skills (skips, bounds, and push ups to name a few). By spending LESS time on different and MORE time on an athlete’s specific needs, their ability to adapt and master different movement qualities becomes a much more fruitful quest.
Progression IS Variation
As athletes adapt and progress their needs will change over time. It is our job as coaches to continue to increase the stress or stimulus over time to continue to stress the system to make adaptations. From a programming perspective, sets, reps, and intensities should be “varied” to change the overall stimulus (for example tonnage). This is not however, variation for the sake of variation, this is simply progression. Athletes adaptations and improvements will (hopefully) also cause their needs to change over time. Thus training programs will eventually vary, based simply on the principle of progression.
When designing a program the only thing that matters is the athlete. By simplifying programming we are able to focus only on what that athlete needs. Does the head coach ever change up the offensive philosophy to mix it up? How about a surgeon try a new technique just to see what happens? We need to understand when dealing with athletes we are often dealing with their livelihood. Variety for the sake of variety is selfish.